|
Quality System
Training - How Important is It?
By Marci L.
Crane
Article Word Count: 623 [View
Summary] Comments (0)
What is the most important aspect of quality system
management?
Some might say that strategic implementations, or policies
are the most important aspects of quality system management
but they're very likely wrong-notably wrong.
A Variety of Options
For most life science companies, maintaining a quality
system has become a way of life. However, it probably isn't
these companies' quality systems that keep their products
and services afloat.
Yes, the manner in which a quality system is designed is
duly important but the reality of the situation is that many
quality system designs can work equally well in the same (or
similar) environments. For example, one life science company
may implement a well-known and highly recommended quality
system design (ISO 9001 for example) and find great success
while another very similar company may implement the same
system and fail miserably.
What's the difference?
It's probably training.
Quality System Training
The ability to get company employees to "buy into" a quality
system is likely to make a big difference in a "pass or
fail" quality system trial even, when a well known quality
system design has been implemented. Whether it is change
control, CAPA management, internal audits, customer
complaints management, document control or deviations
management, every company employee needs to know the
following regarding his or her company's quality system:
1. What the quality system policies are (at least those that
will directly or indirectly affect him or her);
2. What the company's objectives are in relation to the
quality system policies, especially those objectives which
the employee may be contributing to directly or indirectly;
3. What the company's plans are to achieve those objectives
especially those plans that will directly or indirectly
affect the employee involved.
Training Comprehension
Every company should also take steps towards the testing of
every employee's comprehension of policies, objectives and
plans related to quality system management. Measuring
comprehension does NOT infer that a written exam be
administered to employees. Perhaps simple observation from
employee supervisors will be sufficient to determine whether
one employee has a sufficient grasp of the policies
objectives and plans that he or she should be aware of.
According to the FDA's guidance document: Quality Systems
Approach to Pharmaceutical cGMP Regulations, "Policies,
objectives, and plans under a modern quality system provide
the means by which senior managers articulate their vision
of and commitment to quality to all levels of the
organization."1
The FDA guidance also states that "senior management should
incorporate a strong commitment to quality into the
organizational mission."2 This of course can be accomplished
by writing a "commitment to quality statement" in the
company's organizational mission. However, without training,
employees are unlikely to care about or even think about
quality management ideals and expectations.
To remedy this common dilemma, quality managers need to
consider taking the following steps:
1. Ask Questions - Quality managers need to take time to
talk, and most importantly, ask questions of every employee
involved in quality. Well thought out questions regarding
quality will at the very least get employees considering the
endeavors they are involved in.
2. Delegate - More and more, quality is becoming less of a
department and more of a group effort. That may seem scary
for quality professionals but the reality is that delegation
to numerous people (and/or departments)--combined with
consistent follow through--always results in better business
and better relationships between those who lead and those
who follow.
3. A Quality Example - If quality managers don't take
quality seriously then it is less likely that other
department employees will take the time to contribute to a
company "quality cause."
Conclusion
In short, quality system management may at times seem
complex but it's actually like most managerial
responsibilities---primarily a people process.
Reference
1-2 fda.gov/CDER/guidance/7260fnl.htm#_Toc147046901
Marci Crane is a copywriter for
MasterControl in Salt Lake City, Utah. To learn about
more about
quality system automation solutions that allow quality
managers more time for quality system training and purpose
awareness, please feel free to
contact a MasterControl representative.
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Marci_L._Crane |